And Todd is spot on regarding the responsibility of the media. As Thomas Jefferson said,
“The press is the best instrument for enlightening the mind of man, and improving him as a rational, moral and social being”Unfortunately, Todd's high minded declarations often do not translate into action. I regularly watch his Daily Rundown Show and mostly it is a gaggle of frustrated campaign strategist wannabes dishing out their unsolicited advice to the candidates. They talk about the process, make predictions... focus on the latest polling.. in other words most of the time is dedicated to issues that the American people care LEAST about.
Case in point. I watched Todd's interview with presidential candidate Gary Johnson. The interview was about 5 minutes and the bulk of the time was spent on discussing whether Johnson takes more votes away from Romney or Obama. The rest of the time was spent on ballot access, fundraising and a bit on Johnson's VP pick.
Not one question about how Johnson plans to balance the budget, reform entitlements, implement tax reform. Not one question about why Johnson believes he is the best man for the job. Not one question about Johnson's record in office. In other words, not one question about matters that will help voters make an informed decision come November.
Todd is not alone as far as focusing on Johnson as an election spoiler. It seems that the press is operating under the assumption that the White House exclusively belongs to Republican and Democrat candidates.
The reality is that the White House does not belong to Republicans and Democrats. It belongs to the people. The votes do not belong to Romney or Obama... they belong to the voters. It is up to Obama, Romney and Johnson to earn the votes.
A vote for Obama is a vote for Obama. A vote for Romney is a vote for Romney. Finally, a vote for Johnson is a vote for Johnson. Period. This is not about "taking" votes. It is about "earning" votes... at least it should be.
If the media wants to serve the people as it claims, it must also stop creating self-fulfilling prophecies by declaring - months ahead of election day- which candidate can or cannot win. This is the equivalent of waking up in the morning and saying to yourself you cannot get up from bed. Proceed to stay in bed and at the end of the day congratulating yourself for being right about not being able to get up.
As long as a candidate is on the ballot, he or she can win. So can Gary Johnson win? Yes, he can. Is he likely to win? Not as long as people focus on process and other distractions instead of focusing on who is the best candidate to do the job for the next four years. And not as long as voters forget that it is the people's White House... not Romney's or Obama's White House.